Gringo1 wrote:
Hello,
i am going do by Supermicro X9DRD-iF motherboard and i was wondering do i have to buy raid contoller or build in will do.
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/xeon/c600/x9drd-if.cfm
I will use exsi 5.1
Thanks.
Well for one that MB is not on the HCL for VMware, so all bets are off. Built in controllers are all real basic, no battery cache, no true command queue (the documenation states it will work, but it's really just compatibility with the drive but not performance related).
What you should do is buy a RAID controller that *IS* on the HCL, of course be prepared to spend around $1000.00 or more. If you are TRULY interested in performance you will buy a SAS controller, which is around $3000.00 or more.. because SATA drives (your built in controller) are NOT performance friendly.
Yeah people use them, yeah people get "GREAT" performance.. but those are one offs, and probably only 1 maybe 2 VM's and not intense disk IO.
I will defy anyone that shows me their system, and I can run 2 tools to bring any SATA controller \ DISK to it's knees to prove my point. SATA drives offer capacity not performance. SAS is the best, SATA will not be good for multiple operations at the same time, especailly running multiple VM's.
In the mean time, test it.. you probably have 4 maybe 6 SATA ports, hook up 6 SATA drives, put them in a RAID 5, and post your IOPS results.. it might look good in THEORY.. but when you start to use VM's try a IO performance program in around 3 VM's all running at the same time and compare the results.. you will see what I am talking about, you performance will take an extreme nose dive. I would test it on your MB first, if you think you need a RAID controller, be prepared to spend LOTS of money. You might be better off buying a low end enterprise server from Dell like a 210 or 310.. that will be less than your MB + a controller.. (That is if you want to do it right)