As a legacy Perpetual Licence holder, I had no support contract, you can't renew or buy it for perpetual anymore, so I didn't automatically migrate.
I am still dealing with support who are desperately trying to close the case. They are saying explicitly, you have an account we can see you have valid licences but no contract that means you do not get a Site ID which means no download entitlements.
They don't care if you have a valid perpetual licence, the Broadcom answer is go buy a new subscription to a new product. I understand you can decide to stop selling new perpetual licences, that is your legal right. To retrospectively deny access to download installers and patches for customers with existing perpetual licences is a legal grey area to me.
The whole ethos of the Broadcom acquisition seems to be merciless profit squeezing. The cancellation of the freeware version of ESXi was small minded and petty. It just hit tech and home lab users: i.e. small business tech departments (running test not production environments), students learning the system and home enthusiasts. If you had a small business production environment the way to go was legal using the cheap VMWare essentials package on a perpetual licence. If you were short on budget that year you just dropped the support contract and picked it up again when you had the money to upgrade. Not the best business model I agree but it gained them thousands of SME customers. Killing perpetual on acquisition was just squeezing more money out of the small businesses at a time they could least afford it.
It is long overdue for the legislatures to investigate this acquisition, which like so many others, has not been in the public interest.
Broadcom the answer is simple: Put the whole of your legacy products archive outside your paywall. If you are not supporting it fine, that is your right. Just do the honourable thing and allow existing users with valid licence keys to get on with doing their own thing. If hosting costs are an issue (billion-dollar profits so not really an argument) there are public mirrors out there.
If Broadcom don't sell it, or support it, anymore what exactly are you gaining by holding onto it?
If you annoy enough people they will not upgrade, they will vote with their feet and leave. There are other suppliers out there and Open Source Proxmox is now supported by Veeam by end of year. Writing is on the wall, I think. What does everyone else think?
Kind Regards,
Nick
Original Message:
Sent: 5/23/2024 11:17:00 AM
From: ocheeslice
Subject: RE: No entitlements, licenses etc
I ended up calling the support number to get set up with my site number. After a couple of days in the pending mode, I opened a case about not being able to join/split/upgrade license files and complained that nothing was showing in my entitlements. They managed to get my site ID from pending to approved and everything works now including the support page for cases. So my advice would be not to wait for your site ID to move from pending to approved as there is something wrong with their process. Open a case that you can't do something {get to My Cases, change license keys, etc.} and when they reply with a solution make sure to complain about the site ID not being approved so their solution isn't an option at this point and they will get it fixed for you.
+1 800 225 5224 -- Call if you need help with getting a site ID and requesting access
<https://support.broadcom.com/group/ecx/contact-support> - Click Open new case [blue button] on right side of screen under Customer Case Management -> open a case saying you can't do something and when they reply complain that your entitlements are not there so you still can't do the solution they suggest.
Original Message:
Sent: May 16, 2024 02:45 PM
From: Debra Parent
Subject: No entitlements, licenses etc
I have nothing in my dashboard. No entitlements, no licenses, etc. and the support page errors out.