Maybe you could try to upgrade your VM-version to 9 or 10 (backup first, of course), even if that article says it should work with VM-version 8. Or do you have any reason for still using version 8 (I see on the screenshot)?
BTW, I think it is actually useless to present virtual drive to VM as "SSD" if you are using local raid10-ssd datastore. No SSD-related command (i.e. trim) is passed to real SSD through raid-controller. AFAIK, this can be done only in pure raid0-configuration (and no vmfs in between), and even then not all raid-controllers and SSDs support it. VM-OS could maybe at least aling partitions to SSD-boundaries correctly, but then again you have vmfs in between which should take care of it first.
So as it is written in that virtuallyGhetto-article: you could emulate SSD in VM to see what it makes. But this is maybe useful for developers of SSD-related software. From practical point of view, this does not change anything with respect to underlying SSDs. Any other SSD-related optimization (i.e. turn indexing off, use ramdisk for temp to minimize writing, etc). you can do even without exposing storage as SSD to your VM-OS...