The only reason VMware did not allow the use of USB as a datastore was simple: Reliability.
USB 1.1 an 2.0 can not handle the sheer volume of I/O required by VMware and the VMs. It is also the reason you should not use a cheap drives, green drives, or cheap NAS device or network equipment. If it can not handle the I/O, may hang, crash, and/or go offline. Taking a datastore offline while it is in the middle of being accessed is a VERY bad thing.
Now that USB 3.0 and 3.1 are out, you can be sure that VMware is looking at this new transports as a possible option.
Why would they not support USB 3.0+ technology? What would stop them from allowing now that it is so fast?
1. If I/O performance is not stable or equal to other direct.
2. If they can not find a way to keep older USB devices (1.1 and 2.0) from being used.
3. If the storage can not be expanded without adversely impacting I/O or performance. (Keep in mind that in most directly attached storage solutions, adding disks actually increases performance)
4. Certainty that users will not abuse the policies for using USB, and try to get support for unsupported USB solutions.
If it did happen, what we might see would be a list of approved vendors or specifications.
Remember, just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Luis