DX Application Performance Management

Expand all | Collapse all

<CA_APM_CorID> injected in the application header

Jump to Best Answer
  • 1.  <CA_APM_CorID> injected in the application header

    Posted 08-10-2017 03:52 PM

    After upgrading the java agent for 9.7.0.27 to 10.5.2, we are seeing a new tag <CA_APM_CorID> getting injected in the application header which is causing issues?  Does anyone know how to disable this?

     

    Thanks,

    Robert



  • 2.  Re: <CA_APM_CorID> injected in the application header



  • 3.  Re: <CA_APM_CorID> injected in the application header
    Best Answer

    Posted 08-10-2017 06:45 PM

    Hi Robert,

    If this is due to standard SPM/SOA correlation these properties should stop it:

    com.wily.introscope.agent.soapheaderread.enabled=false
    com.wily.introscope.agent.soapheaderinsertion.enabled=false
    com.wily.introscope.agent.httpheaderread.enabled=false
    com.wily.introscope.agent.httpheaderinsertion.enabled=false

    SOA-Specific Agent Configuration Properties - CA Application Performance Management - 10.5 - CA Technologies Documentati… 

     

    If that does not change the behaviour it may be related to redesigned HTTP correlation in 10.x which no longer needs SPM/SOA extension and is enabled by default. You can try to comment out httpcorrelation.pbd in the *typical.pbl/*full.pbl file you are using and see if that makes any difference.

     

    Hope that helps

     

    Regards,

     

    Lynn



  • 4.  Re: <CA_APM_CorID> injected in the application header

    Posted 08-11-2017 09:43 AM

    I wonder if this is related to JMS correlation,  believe Http and JMS correlation mechanism work independently.

     

    If you are using Tibco, OSB and Webmethods, we have the below property.
    com.wily.introscope.agent.jmsheaderinsertion.enabled

     

    Try to removing jms.pbd from the <app>-full/typical pbl

     

    I hope this helps,

    Regards,

    Sergio



  • 5.  Re: <CA_APM_CorID> injected in the application header

    Posted 08-11-2017 12:40 PM

    Hi Robert:

         Two possible solutions were given. So marking as correct.

    However, the thread does not have to end here.  Please let us know if any of the recommendations helped resolve the issue. And if you have any followup questions. 

     

    Thanks

    Hal German