vSphere Storage Appliance

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

DataCore thin provisioning and vSphere Thin provisioning, is there an issue

  • 1.  DataCore thin provisioning and vSphere Thin provisioning, is there an issue

    Posted Apr 10, 2015 09:54 PM

    Hey Everyone,

    Question:  If Datacore is thin provisioned (storage layer), and VM's are thin provisioned (VMWare layer); is there an issue if:

    •     A VM is thick provisioned and then thin provisioned back?

    I have heard there is a concern that if this is done, there is lost storage at the storage layer?

    Has anyone run across this or heard of it before?  I was told under these circumstances a process needs to be run at the storage layer to "RECLAIM," the storage after a process like this.

    Any insight you may have on this is greatly appreciated.

    Thank you,
    Matthew



  • 2.  RE: DataCore thin provisioning and vSphere Thin provisioning, is there an issue

    Posted Jun 20, 2015 06:39 PM

    Hey juchestyle,

    we have an issue with thin on thin provisioning.

    In our environment we use a HP 3PAR 7400 and VMware vSphere ESXi 5.5.

    Let me describe the issue in 4 simple steps:

    1. Take a vm (thin provisioned vmdk) with an attached vmware-snapshot

    2. Clone it with vmware-means to a newly thin provisioned volume

    3. Delete the clone

    4. Clone again to the same target-volume

    Result: The second cloning takes way longer than the first. Doing an UNMAP (that´s the spacereclaimation "esxcli storage vmfs unmap -l DATASTORELABLE") between 3 and 4 makes the second cloning as fast as the first one.


    I just posted our issue today (poor cloning performance at thin provisioning - takes forever!) and hope anybody got an idea to resolve it.

    If you have similiar experience I would be glad to have an exchange with you...


    Thanks,

    Max