IDMS

 View Only

Why Parallel Unload/Reload would have helped.........

  • 1.  Why Parallel Unload/Reload would have helped.........

    Posted Jun 14, 2006 01:16 PM
    Thought I would share some interesting statistics from a=20 situation
    where the new Express Unload/Reload would have helped.=20

    We added a new area/records that we added to satisfy some Sarbanes Oxley

    compliance requirements. This new area grew at a rate no one
    anticipated.=20 One fine Wednesday before we can look at the weekly
    print space reports, I get a call that this new production area has
    filled up=20 and task are taking 1211's all over the place.=20

    Since this was our busiest production region we had to act quickly
    and=20 ran an expand page and changed the block size from 6516 to
    13032.=20 We were only down 18 minutes and the earthquake only measured
    2.3=20 on the management scale...

    However, before I could get a good weekend to unload/reload the area,
    the area fills once again in the middle of a week. (Murphy's law hard at
    work) This time I decided an extend space was in order and I added 3
    datasets to the=20 area. So now I have an area that has been xpaged and
    extended.=20

    I expected the I/O to the area to go up because of the space=20
    management implications, but the interesting part is the I/O went=20
    through the roof! See the real daily I/O to the area below;=20

    I/O per day
    Before XPAGE 450,000 =20
    After XPAGE 902,177 =20
    After Extend Space 10,773,437 - yes, over 10 million, this is not a typo

    After Unload/Reload 497,783 =20

    As you can see when we were able to unload/reload it=20 cut the I/O
    considerably (understatement!).=20 The good news is the new Express
    Unload/Reload would=20 have allowed me to unload reload the area in a
    much smaller time frame.=20 I could have reorganized the area before it
    filled the second time.=20 We are all looking forward to this new SP4
    feature.

    Regards,
    Terry Schwartz

    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    Re: Why Parallel Unload/Reload would have helped.........
    "Henny,

    What's the format of your dbkey? (430 records per page tells me it's not the
    default).
    Is it a problem users are not able to access the data being unloaded for
    such a long time or do they have access to a copy of the data?


    Kind Regards,

    Sibe Verbeek
    DBA
    Fortis Bank
    Tel. 31-030-2260591
    Woerden
    The Netherlands

    -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
    Van: IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    [mailTo:IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM]Namens Henny.Malipaard@MAIL.RVS.NL
    Verzonden: donderdag 15 juni 2006 11:27
    Aan: IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    Onderwerp: Why Parallel Unload/Reload would have helped.........


    Terry,

    At this time I'm busy (waiting) with a Unload/reload of 2 area's. This
    is a big one.
    The biggest area contains 865,000,000 recs.
    It has a pagesize of 13690 and 2,000,000 pages.
    New size is 8904 and 4,000,000 pages.
    It takes me 10 days to do it.
    I use all the time 2 tapeunits and 130 packs for work.
    When i could use the new Utility I think it would cost me 3 days and 600
    packs because it don't work with tape.

    Met vriendelijke groeten/ Kind regards,

    Henny Malipaard

    RVS IT Services/AMSpecials/DBA
    Locatiecode VPT F03.01
    Postbus 225, 6710 DA, Ede (gld)
    Loevestein 33, 6714 BS, Ede (gld)
    T (0318) 663066, F (0318) 663961
    E henny.malipaard@mail.rvs.nl
    Parttimedag: vrijdagmiddag

    Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:16:26 -0500
    From: ""Schwartz, Terry"" <Terry.Schwartz@PS.NET>
    Subject: Why Parallel Unload/Reload would have helped.........

    Thought I would share some interesting statistics from a=20 situation
    where the new Express Unload/Reload would have helped.=20

    We added a new area/records that we added to satisfy some Sarbanes Oxley

    compliance requirements. This new area grew at a rate no one
    anticipated.=20 One fine Wednesday before we can look at the weekly
    print space reports, I get a call that this new production area has
    filled up=20 and task are taking 1211's all over the place.=20

    Since this was our busiest production region we had to act quickly
    and=20 ran an expand page and changed the block size from 6516 to
    13032.=20 We were only down 18 minutes and the earthquake only measured
    2.3=20 on the management scale...

    However, before I could get a good weekend to unload/reload the area,
    the area fills once again in the middle of a week. (Murphy's law hard at
    work) This time I decided an extend space was in order and I added 3
    datasets to the=20 area. So now I have an area that has been xpaged and
    extended.=20

    I expected the I/O to the area to go up because of the space=20
    management implications, but the interesting part is the I/O went=20
    through the roof! See the real daily I/O to the area below;=20

    I/O per day
    Before XPAGE 450,000 =20
    After XPAGE 902,177 =20
    After Extend Space 10,773,437 - yes, over 10 million, this is not a typo

    After Unload/Reload 497,783 =20

    As you can see when we were able to unload/reload it=20
    cut the I/O considerably (understatement!).=20
    The good news is the new Express Unload/Reload would=20
    have allowed me to unload reload the area in a much smaller time
    frame.=20 I could have reorganized the area before it filled the second
    time.=20 We are all looking forward to this new SP4 feature.

    Regards,
    Terry Schwartz
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    ATTENTION:
    The information in this electronic mail message is private and
    confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you
    receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that
    any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this
    message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by
    reply transmission and delete the message without copying or
    opening it.

    Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known.
    If this message contains password-protected attachments, the
    files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain.
    Always scan attachments before opening them.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------


    ****************************DISCLAIMER***********************************
    Deze e-mail is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Verstrekking aan en gebruik door anderen is niet toegestaan. Fortis sluit iedere aansprakelijkheid uit die voortvloeit uit electronische verzending.

    This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee(s), and may not be passed on to, or made available for use by any person other than the addressee(s). Fortis rules out any and every liability resulting from any electronic transmission.
    ******************************************************************************

    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    Why Parallel Unload/Reload would have helped.........
    "Terry,

    At this time I'm busy (waiting) with a Unload/reload of 2 area's. This
    is a big one.
    The biggest area contains 865,000,000 recs.
    It has a pagesize of 13690 and 2,000,000 pages.
    New size is 8904 and 4,000,000 pages.
    It takes me 10 days to do it.
    I use all the time 2 tapeunits and 130 packs for work.
    When i could use the new Utility I think it would cost me 3 days and 600
    packs because it don't work with tape.

    Met vriendelijke groeten/ Kind regards,

    Henny Malipaard

    RVS IT Services/AMSpecials/DBA
    Locatiecode VPT F03.01
    Postbus 225, 6710 DA, Ede (gld)
    Loevestein 33, 6714 BS, Ede (gld)
    T (0318) 663066, F (0318) 663961
    E henny.malipaard@mail.rvs.nl
    Parttimedag: vrijdagmiddag

    Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:16:26 -0500
    From: ""Schwartz, Terry"" <Terry.Schwartz@PS.NET>
    Subject: Why Parallel Unload/Reload would have helped.........

    Thought I would share some interesting statistics from a=20 situation
    where the new Express Unload/Reload would have helped.=20

    We added a new area/records that we added to satisfy some Sarbanes Oxley

    compliance requirements. This new area grew at a rate no one
    anticipated.=20 One fine Wednesday before we can look at the weekly
    print space reports, I get a call that this new production area has
    filled up=20 and task are taking 1211's all over the place.=20

    Since this was our busiest production region we had to act quickly
    and=20 ran an expand page and changed the block size from 6516 to
    13032.=20 We were only down 18 minutes and the earthquake only measured
    2.3=20 on the management scale...

    However, before I could get a good weekend to unload/reload the area,
    the area fills once again in the middle of a week. (Murphy's law hard at
    work) This time I decided an extend space was in order and I added 3
    datasets to the=20 area. So now I have an area that has been xpaged and
    extended.=20

    I expected the I/O to the area to go up because of the space=20
    management implications, but the interesting part is the I/O went=20
    through the roof! See the real daily I/O to the area below;=20

    I/O per day
    Before XPAGE 450,000 =20
    After XPAGE 902,177 =20
    After Extend Space 10,773,437 - yes, over 10 million, this is not a typo

    After Unload/Reload 497,783 =20

    As you can see when we were able to unload/reload it=20
    cut the I/O considerably (understatement!).=20
    The good news is the new Express Unload/Reload would=20
    have allowed me to unload reload the area in a much smaller time
    frame.=20 I could have reorganized the area before it filled the second
    time.=20 We are all looking forward to this new SP4 feature.

    Regards,
    Terry Schwartz
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    ATTENTION:
    The information in this electronic mail message is private and
    confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you
    receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that
    any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this
    message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by
    reply transmission and delete the message without copying or
    opening it.

    Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known.
    If this message contains password-protected attachments, the
    files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain.
    Always scan attachments before opening them.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    ADS question
    "Hi everyone,

    I have what I hope is a very simple question, but I can't find the
    answer. In ADS, I need to test to make sure a field does not contain
    any special characters. In other words, the 8 bytes field can contain A
    thru Z, 0 thru 9, in any combination, but no other character is
    permitted. Is there an easy way to test for this ?

    Thanks,
    Laura Rochon
    Ajilon

    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    Re: ADS question
    "I would use VERIFY to test the field. This statement would be true if
    it found a character NOT in the string.

    IF VER(WK-FIELD,'0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ ') NE 0
    THEN
    DISPLAY TEXT 'INVALID SPECIFICATION FOR FIELD'.