Stuart
I did as you suggested and googled it. IBM has specific instruction on their website for performing the change.
Personally, I think if this what is needed for COBOL 5.2 to function properly IBM should make it the rule when a client implements the COBOL, but that's me.
Thanks to your and storage guys for the updates. I wish my storage guys were as up-to-date.
I previously asked about AMODE 24. Just a few minutes ago I pulled up a presentation from the SHARE conference in ORLANDO. The presentation is called COBOL 5.2 What's New?
One of the answers is, due to basically an OUTCRY from customers,
AMODE 24 support
– AMODE 24 mode execution now allowed in the same cases as V3 and V4
• Static linking to AMODE 24 assembler programs the big driver here.