Hello skh,
I'd echo what David said.
In particular about not skipping this MDB patch and do choose to go ahead and install it.
The wording of the question mentions that you may skip it if you have already installed the MDB patch for another capability. However, typically, you would know this - you don't tend to forget putting on an MDB patch. Or shouldn't. :-)
However, you can always check what is in a patch by decompressing (cazipxp -u <patch number>) it first and looking at the files.
In this case, ITSM 14.1.03 is RO90566.
RO90566 contains CASM_14.1.03_CommonPatchInstaller_Win.zip
CASM_14.1.03_CommonPatchInstaller_Win.zip contains RO90508 WIN-14.1.03 LANGUAGES PATCH.
RO90508 contains:
- MSSQL_MDB.CAZ 8643711 THU JUN 02 07:19:34 2016
- ORACLE_MDB.CAZ 8520072 THU JUN 02 07:19:34 2016
And if you open up those, you'll find a readme on the MDB patch for your relevant version. For example, this is the one for SQL:
- CA Management Database r1.0.04-030 Service Pack 16788484 Readme
IN SHORT
- So you could check to see if you have RO90508 loaded in your <servername>.HIS file, and also check that MDB patch to see if it gives details that allows you to identify it on your system.
- The general "rule of thumb" though is "Do not skip an MDB patch without good reason."
- The corollary to that rule is "The wise person takes backups and runs installation tests on servers with snapshots."
Let us know what choice you made and the result.
Thanks, Kyle_R.
P.S. Could the installer be smarter and do this check for you? Probably.
You may like to raise an Idea for this and cross-link to this post.