IM2.0 Vendor Certification for Linux Host hrSwRun/hrSWRunPerf OIDs

[Anon Anon]

Does anyone have a Vendor Cert created for Linux Memory usage per process ?

 

I have a need of monitoring Per Process Memory Usage

[Anon Anon]

So I've tried to create my own Metric Family, but for some reason the XML is supposedly incorrect when I try to import it via the Web GUI in Data Aggregator.

 

This is my XML, which matches what I should have according to the Power User Certification Guide.

 

Anyone have any ideas ?

 

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<DataModel namespace="http://im.ca.com/normalizer" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="IMDBCertificationFacet.xsd">

  <FacetType name="NormalizedLinuxProcessResources" descriptorClass="com.ca.im.core.datamodel.certs.NormalizedFacetDescriptorImpl">

    <Documentation>Defines the identification information, configuration

  information, and polled

  metrics for Linux Process Monitoring</Documentation>

    <FacetOf namespace="http://im.ca.com/core" name="Item"/>

    <AttributeGroup name="LinuxProcessGroup" external="true" list="true">

      <Documentation/>

      <Attribute name="Indexes" type="ObjectID[]">

        <Documentation/>

      </Attribute>

      <Attribute name="Names" type="String">

        <Documentation/>

      </Attribute>

      <Attribute name="Processes" type="String">

        <Documentation>The process name</Documentation>

      </Attribute>

      <Attribute name="ProcessMemoryUtilisation" type="Double">

        <Documentation>Process Memory Used</Documentation>

        <IsDbColumn>true</IsDbColumn>

        <Baseline>false</Baseline>

        <RollupExpression/>

        <Minimum>true</Minimum>

        <Maximum>true</Maximum>

        <RollupStrategy>Avg</RollupStrategy>

        <StandardDeviation>false</StandardDeviation>

        <Variance>false</Variance>

        <Percentile>0</Percentile>

        <Polled>true</Polled>

        <Units>Bytes</Units>

      </Attribute>

      <Attribute name="ProcessCPUUtilisation" type="Double">

        <Documentation>Process CPU Utilization</Documentation>

        <IsDbColumn>true</IsDbColumn>

        <Baseline>false</Baseline>

        <RollupExpression/>

        <Minimum>true</Minimum>

        <Maximum>true</Maximum>

        <RollupStrategy>Avg</RollupStrategy>

        <StandardDeviation>false</StandardDeviation>

        <Variance>false</Variance>

        <Percentile>0</Percentile>

        <Polled>true</Polled>

        <Units>Percent</Units>

      </Attribute>

    </AttributeGroup>

    <Attribute name="SourceFacetTypes" cached="true" list="true" persistent="true" type="QName">

      <Documentation/>

    </Attribute>

    <DisplayName>Linux Process</DisplayName>

    <Protocol>IMDB</Protocol>

    <TableName>NRM_LINUX_PROCESS</TableName>

    <Normalized>true</Normalized>

    <ComponentFacets>

      <Facet>{http://im.ca.com/inventory}LinuxProcess</Facet>

    </ComponentFacets>

    <Expressions>

      <ExpressionGroup name="DeviceComponent" destCert="{http://im.ca.com/inventory}DeviceComponent">

        <Expression destAttr="IndexList">Indexes</Expression>

      </ExpressionGroup>

      <ExpressionGroup name="Item" destCert="{http://im.ca.com/core}Item">

        <Expression destAttr="Name">Names</Expression>

        <Expression destAttr="Processes">Processes</Expression>

      </ExpressionGroup>

    </Expressions>

  </FacetType>

</DataModel>

[Anon Anon]

Ok, so I managed to build it and import it into CA DA

 

And now I've realised...it won't differentiate between processes when I try and monitor this

 

Is there a way I can get it to graph and and every process ? I know there will be a lot of them, but it's what I require.

 

Is there any way I could display the index on each graph or something ?

[Anon Anon]

Ok, I've gotten it working now. Needed some baselines setup I think.

 

I now have separate process memory usage in CA PC. If anyone requires this metric please let me know

[Legacy User]

I need this metric, would you be able to provide it?