Fusion

 View Only

 Vmware nd UTM can'f communicate

TECH198's profile image
TECH198 posted Jul 21, 2026 10:04 AM

I have Sophos XG running inside UTM o. my Macbook Pro M4, Port 1 set to Host Only (192.168.128.5) and Port 2 set to Bridged (192.168.1.101) which also getting ip from router 192,168,1,1

Any VM running behind Sophos on Host only network(Windows 7 or whatever) can go though Sophos by gateway IP and DNS point to Port 1 Host only

I'm trying route VMWare fusion through Sophos but can't cannot..... I tried creating custom network vmnet2 and point to 192,168.128.0 with no success.

I think I must use Bridged to get all to both to talk 

But since there is a router in between any outbound connection from VMWare doesn't even see even  Sophos if i set static.

tracert from command prompt from Fusion results in:

tracert 8.8.8.8

Reply from 192,168.1.1...........

....and the next hop is ISP... so completely ignores other UTM

Instead, I would like:  

tracert 8,.8.8.8

Reply from 192.168..1.1

Reply from 192.168.1.110 < Port 2 on Sophos firewall

..and go out that way

What am I doing wrong?.

Technogeezer's profile image
External Moderator Technogeezer

From what I see out of a UTM "host only" network, it is creating its own local virtual network (as evidenced by the unique network bridge and vmenet devices for hosts using that virtual network as shown by the ifconfig command on the host). VMs running under UTM can communicate because that hypervisor understands that a 'host only' network should use that local virtual network that UTM created.

Fusion's host only network does something similar for its host-only networks. It creates a virtual network segment for its host only networks. The problem with what I think you're trying to do is that Fusion creates a separate virtual network segment (from ifconfig, you see that there is a separate network bridge and associated adapters per VM for its host-only virtual networking). Your Fusion VM using its host only network can't talk to any UTM VM over its host only network because you have two independent network segments with no routing or bridging between the two. 

IMO what you want to do might take some tinkering with bridging and/or VLAN configurations...