Hi,
We seen a definite improvement after switching to Veeam.
The amount of storage that it took up on our destination stores was the main factor. We only needed to save incremental changes with Veeam, and with ghettoVCB we were constantly replicating complete vmdk's.
Also the ability to utilize VSS, change block tracking, and just the ease of use to failover to a replica, as well as fail back to the original VM I found required a lot less manual intervention.
We have tested the failovers multiple times, as these boxes on our dmz are only lisenced with VMware essentials and we can't utilize vmotion when doing hardware maintenance.
As for backing up the data, Veeam seems to be a lot faster than what we got with the ghetto scripts, as well, provides deduplication and indexing.
Then, Veeam V5 came around that added a slew of new features which are great...I'm sure you know about them all if you are lisenced...
Is there anything particular that you can't get working with Veeam? I found it fairly easy and straight forward when setting it up...
Price wise however, ghettovcb certainly has an advantage :smileyhappy: