vSphere Hypervisor

 View Only

Microsoft Server Licensing Implications with VMotion

  • 1.  Microsoft Server Licensing Implications with VMotion

    Posted Jan 06, 2012 03:45 PM

    One of my friends recently emailed me to clarify a point on potential implication of Microsoft Server Licensing on VMware, in perticular with regards to VMotioning (moving running VM's amongst different physical "ESX" servers).  He was notified by their software partner during a recent audit that either they need to starting buying windows data centre licenses to cover all the ESX server CPUs in order to continue free DRS initiated (or Otherwise) VMotion, or turn off VMotion alltogether.

    So I thought I'd share my reply to him with all of you as this seems to be an area that is still either not very clear amongst lot of folks OR often, people simply choose to ignore alltogether (arguably, due understandable reasons). I've obviously modified some lines to remove the identity of my friend...etc but the message remains intact....!!

    NB: Please note that this info only applies to server virtualisation and NOT VDI

    Windows Licensing & VMware

    Unfortunately, the common assessment that Windows Datacentre license is the most practical method to license your VMs within an ESX cluster is the correct one if you want the VMs to freely move in between physical ESX hosts via VMotion as a part of DRS initiated VMotion or otherwise (i.e. Administrative VMotion for maintenance tasks).

    In order to understand why, you first need to understand the MS server licensing limitations. Usually, all windows server licenses are tied to the underlying physical hardware. This is still same even if that server is a VM, in which case the VM's OS license is tied to the ESX servers hardware, usually the ESX server where the VM ware created & build with that Windows Server OS. So, when you look at VMotioning that VM off of that ESX server to another, the following limitations apply.

    • If its an OEM Windows Server license, the OS license is tied to the original ESX server hardware (regardless of whether its STD, Ent or DC license) and is never moveble to another hardware through VMotion or any other method. So No VMotioning allowed there.

    • If its bought though a Volume Licensing program, (Regardless of the license type - STD, ENT and DC), it can be reassigned to another physical hardware (i.e. the VM can be VMotioned from  one ESX host to another) ONLY every 90 days through VMotion or other methods. It however permits you move it from one ESX server to nother in the event of a hardware failure without being subjected to this 90 day rule. (So HA initiated VM restart on another server due to hardware failures are permitted)
    So, for all the Windows server licenses bought through the volume licensing program, if those VMs need to be freely moveble within an ESX farm (Such as DRS initiated VMotion), each ESX host (physical hardware) need to be licensed for the worst case scenario (aka: Peak usage where all VMs may end up running in 1 ESX server hardware for example) unless you can ensure this will never happen. Whether each ESX host is licensed to run these VMs is entirely dependent upon the type of windows server licensing you have assigned to each VM. Given below is a description (I will use windows 2008 licensing below, but it can be run in downgraded mode to run Windows 2003/2000 if need be),
    With windows 2008 STD
    It only allows to run 1 instance of that VM on a specific set of underlying hardware. i.e. If the VM was licensed on ESX01, it is only licensed to run on that server's hardware. If the VM is to run on ESX02 after being VMotioned, you need to have another Widows server 2008 STD license to cover that.
    So if the VM to freely move amongst 5 ESX servers, you need 5 x Windows server STD licenses just to cover that VM alone.

    With Windows 2008 ENTERPRISE
    It allows to run 4 instance of that VM on a specific set of hardware. i.e. A single Windows 2008 Ent license would allow up to 4 windows 2008 Ent VMs (or the editions below ENT) to run within a specific ESX server. (That is, if 4 VMs were created on the ESX01, you can run all of them with just 1 Enterprise license as long as they reside only on ESX01). If the VMs were to move to ESX02, you need another Enterprise license to cover that.
    So, if we have 5 ESX servers and 8 VMs (Ent or STD), the number of Enterprise lisences we need to cover the 8 VMs to freely VMotion would be 10 (2 Ent licenses per server to cover a peak scenario where all 8 could be running on the same ESX host).

    With Windows 2008 Data Center
    There are no limits to the number of VMs that can be run on an ESX server with the Data Centre license. If however those VMs need to move to another ESX server, that ESX server also need a Data Center license.  Under the DC license, you can also run Windows server STD and ENT due to downgrade rights. This therefore is more cost benefitial within an average ESX cluster.
    Lets look at a scenario where we have 32 VMs running amongst 4 ESX servers where each ESX server has 4 CPUs
    License Costs (As per the MS online quotes in British Pounds as of today. ofcourse you will not pay these prices due to volume licensing discounts since they are all proportionate, the saving % would be around the same) -  STD Licensing cost = £600.00, ENT license cost = £1,900.00, DC license cost (per CPU) = £2,000.00

    • Total costs under Widows Standard licensing       = 600 x 32 x 4  = £76,800.00

    • Total costs under Widows Enterprise licensing     = 1900 x 8 x 4  = £60,800.00

    • Total costs under Widows Data Centre licensing  = 2000 x 4  x 4 = £32,000.00

    Clearly the Windows Data Center license turns out to be the cheapest in comparison.

    I personally am not a big fan of the MS server licensing mechanism where its always tied to the underlying physical hardware, especially in this (virtual) day and age but hey, its their product and they call the shots. (in fact these terms are the same for even Hyper V users when it comes to live migrating the VMs). However even the cheapest option above is still quite expensive for lot of customers (especially SMEs) and I have seen many people ignoring this licensing cost when planning the budget for their VMware infrastructure.
    If you are willing to share, let me know what you've done with your VMware solutions?? Have you taken this cost in to account within your budget??