Turn on suggestions
![]() Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
|
11-14-2011 11:42 AM
I did not set the domain ID, an onsite engineer performed the configuration. The fabric.ops shows different IDs.
FCSW10:admin> config | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:10
FCSW10:admin>
=========================
FCSW12:FID128:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:2
FCSW12:FID128:admin>
11-14-2011 11:44 AM
I'm not familiar with trunkdebug command so I'll have to do a little research. Is there anything I need to watch out for?
11-15-2011 01:58 AM
Please check the output on both switches of: defzone --show
Send also the error message for your ISL segmentation: errshow -r
Firmware version on both switches: firmwareshow
Post the output here for us to check.
11-15-2011 10:12 AM
Here is the requested output. I must apologize again, I was working on the assumption that the engineer upgraded the new switches to FOS 6.4.2 to match our existing switches.
FCSW10:admin>
FCSW10:admin> defzone --show
Default Zone Access Mode
committed - No Access
transaction - No Transaction
FCSW10:admin> errshow -r
Fabric OS: v6.4.2
2011/11/14-23:38:39, , 5657, FID 128, WARNING, FCSW10, port 45, domain IDs overlap.
2011/11/14-23:29:16, , 5656, FID 128, WARNING, FCSW10, port 45, domain IDs overlap.
FCSW10:admin> firmwareshow
Appl Primary/Secondary Versions
------------------------------------------
FOS v6.4.2
v6.4.2
FCSW10:admin>
===================================================================
FCSW12:FID128:admin> defzone --show
Default Zone Access Mode
committed - No Access
transaction - No Transaction
FCSW12:FID128:admin> errshow -r
Fabric OS: v6.4.1a
2011/11/14-23:38:39, , 207, FID 128, WARNING, FCSW12, port 45, domain IDs overlap.
2011/11/14-23:29:16, , 206, FID 128, WARNING, FCSW12, port 45, domain IDs overlap.
FCSW12:FID128:admin> firmwareshow
Appl Primary/Secondary Versions
------------------------------------------
FOS v6.4.1a
v6.4.1a
11-15-2011 10:47 AM
You have domian ID overlap.
You have in both fabrics the same Domain ID configured.
Do you have any FCR connected to or both switches which try to merge? you have to check which Domain IDs are configured.
Regards,
Andreas
11-15-2011 11:42 AM
Ok, I can see a few things. First of all, are you using virtual fabrics in any of your switches? Try this: fosexec --fid all -c "fabricshow"
In FOS <= 6.4 if you have policy=noaccess and no configuration enabled, this may cause problems when merging with a fabric with config enabled and policy=noaccess. Therefore you have to set policy = allaccess on the new switch before merging.
Do the following on FCSW12:
defzone --allaccess
cfgsave
Try merging once again.
If you still get the same message do the following on FCSW12:
configdefault
reboot
Try to merge once again.
If you run into errors once again then post the output of this command:
fabstatsshow
11-15-2011 12:09 PM
Here's a complete picture of my environment.
I do have a couple of Brocade 7500s. It appears two of the new switches at Site B were configured with the same domain IDs as the two new switches at Site A. Obviously this is not an ideal configuration. However, the FCR at Site B is not physically connected to the new switches, so I don't understand how that conflict would be identified. Also, why would Fabric A at Site A not also have the same problem?
Regardless of the answers to those questions, it looks like my best course of action is to go ahead and upgrade the FOS on FCSW10 and FCSW12 to 6.4.2 as well as change the domain IDs. Would you agree?
Site A
Fabric A - FCSW09 and FCSW11
============================
FCSW09:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:105
--------------------------------------------------------
FCSW11:FID128:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:1
Fabric B - FCSW10 and FCSW12 < ----- ISL not working "(segmented)(domain overlap)"
============================
FCSW10:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:10
--------------------------------------------------------
FCSW12:FID128:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:2
FC7500x01 - FCR
============================
FC7500x01:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:11
Site B
Fabric A - FCSW13 and FCSW15
============================
FCSW13:FID128:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:1
--------------------------------------------------------
FCSW15:FID128:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:3
Fabric B - FCSW14 and FCSW16
============================
FCSW14:FID128:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:2
--------------------------------------------------------
FCSW16:FID128:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:4
FC7500x02 - FCR
============================
FC7500x02:admin> configshow | grep fabric.domain
fabric.domain:12
11-15-2011 10:14 PM
Can you disable the switch FCSW12?
If so change the domain ID to another value like 99 and reenable the ISL and check wich message will be logged in the errdump.
You write this: Fabric B - FCSW10 and FCSW12 < ----- ISL not working "(segmented)(domain overlap)"
For my understanding does this mean you have the same Domain ID in you fabric. Keep inmind that you may have some XD and FD ID in your fabric when router are in place.
Regards,
Andreas