Thanks for the respnose.
I have already gone through the admin guide. It does not mentions the creation of vlans on the box.
Nor does it menitons how to create segment with LACP based connection on the Appliance.
I am worried as how we would be able to create a inspection segment with 2 links(LACP bundle) as input link to the segment and 2 output links to the destination device.
_________LACP link1__________
FW | Switch
_________LACP link2_________
Please note fFW is not our inspection device for ssl traffic inspection. its just another device that is making LACP with switch.
we wana deploy SSLV3800 inbetween those running links. Will SSL support this sort of deployment?.
I know one in/out (network) link is easy deployment which are reffered by guide. But doccumentatoin does not say any thing about double link with traffic being load balanced on both links. Can you refer does the product support such links in segment?.
Also i saw in guide they mentioned passive tap mode has been removed in version 4.x and above. Is there any other option available if we dont wana go with passive inline mode of deployment?.
Original Message:
Sent: 06-10-2021 10:55 AM
From: Kevin Hohenbrink
Subject: SSLV and link aggregation
SSLV is a bump on the wire, essentially acting like a L2 bridge, so we pass LACP through the appliance.
We support Asymmetric routes over different network connections
We can apply policy for VLAN Tags
All your questions can be found in the 4.5 Administration Guide
Kevin H
Original Message:
Sent: 06-09-2021 05:03 AM
From: haris khan
Subject: SSLV and link aggregation
Dear experts,
we are running two linkes from the Switch to the firewall. there is LACP configured between the two devices.
We want to add SSLV appliane for inboud traffic inspection in between these two devices. We want to know can SSLV support below things?..
* Creation of LACP connection?.
* Can device get input traffic on two differnet netwrok connection and output it to the upstream device.
* is there vlan creation support for traffic on the appliance?.