FileMaster

 View Only
  • 1.  FILEMASTER CONTROL CARD LIMITS

    Posted Jul 24, 2019 12:11 PM
    Hi ! 
      We've been doing lot's of data fixes within the last two months, so my question is  what is the limitation on  the control cards  

    Using an example  with a layout record defined 

    UPDATE,  
    IF(RRWK-DCN-NO,EQ,C'xxxxxxxxx'),
    EDIT(RRWK-KEY-CLAIM-NO,EQ,C'some data value',C'some data value'),
    EDIT(RRWK-CLM-NO,EQ,C'some data value',C'some data value'),
    IF(RRWK-DCN-NO,EQ,C'yyyyyyy'),
    EDIT(RRWK-KEY-CLAIM-NO,EQ,C'some data value',C'some data value'),
    EDIT(RRWK-CLM-NO,EQ,C'some data value',C'some data value ')

    With the update keyword, is this considered 3 statements or  7 statements?   and what is the limitation on the number of 
    statements or keywords within a set of control cards 


    ------------------------------
    Derez Lusk Database Specialist, BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: FILEMASTER CONTROL CARD LIMITS
    Best Answer

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Jul 26, 2019 03:05 PM
    I don't think there is limit for control card entries.
    UPDATE is commend. Not keyword.
    https://docops.ca.com/ca-file-master-plus/11/en/using-batch/batch-reference-for-ca-file-master-plus/commands/update

    IF and EDIT is keyword that can be use with UPDATE commend.
    Your example, has single commend has 2 IF keyword statement and each IF keyword statement criteria met then process 2 EDIT keyword statements.

    I am not sure what do you mean by 3 or 7 statements. In scope of UPDATE commend, this is single process per record read for update.


  • 3.  RE: FILEMASTER CONTROL CARD LIMITS

    Posted Jul 29, 2019 06:57 AM
    ​Thank you  Yong Pak ,  for example  the number of  commands,  such as read, update ..etc or    keywords such as edit, if  etc.
    that can be used within 1 instance. for example I may have 1 update command, but 40 edit statements


  • 4.  RE: FILEMASTER CONTROL CARD LIMITS

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Jul 29, 2019 08:20 AM
    That is correct.