Service Virtualization

 View Only
  • 1.  Mule v/s IIB MQ Virtualization

    Posted Aug 20, 2019 03:17 PM
    we have few  IIB MQ virtualization done in the past and they are fine on a server recycle and properly brought up and respond well.
    However the same services are now redesigned via Mule ESB and connects to same IBM queues. However after a service is recycled or gone down, LISA services doesn't respond well. Either they need a redeploy and increase the capacity or stop and start for quick time.

    Is there a solution for this ?

    thanks
    vinay


  • 2.  RE: Mule v/s IIB MQ Virtualization

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Aug 21, 2019 06:49 AM
    Hi Vinay
                I have few questions about your question.

    1. Did you mean to say IBM MQ ?
    2. You said "However after a service is recycled or gone down, LISA services doesn't respond well."
               - What 'service' is referred here that which was recycled ?
               - Which LISA services are referred to in the later part of the statement ?
    3. You said "Either they need a redeploy and increase the capacity or stop and start for quick time."
                - Are you referring to redeploying a Virtual Service ?
                - To what extent the capacity need to be increased for the Virtual Service ?

    Please provide the necessary clarifications


    ------------------------------
    Sankar Natarajan
    Service Virtualization Product Engineering Team
    Broadcom
    ------------------------------