I think you are referring to the mapping of the Varbinds to Event Variables
------------------------------------------------
AlertMap File
As shown in the following example, the OID map can be broken down into three parts: the OID, the value variable ID, and the instance variable ID.
The OID identifies the specific variable being sent with the trap. The previous OID references the ciscoEnvMonSupplyState variable in the Cisco Environment monitoring MIB (CISCO-ENVMON_MIB).
The value variable ID stores the value of the variable that is sent in the variable binding. Any integer value can be used here; however, it must be different from the integer that is used for the instance variable ID. A value of zero indicates that you do not want to store the value of the variable binding.
The instance variable ID stores the instance portion of the OID. If your variable binding identifies a particular object from a table variable within the trap MIB, it is likely to include an instance ID. Any integer value can be used here; however, it must be different from the integer that is used for the value variable ID. A value of zero indicates that you do not want to store the value of the instance variable.
------------------------------------------------
So 19 is just the next variable number to use to store the value of the 1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.1.14.1.10 varbind, 20 is used to store
the instance part of the OID
Original Message:
Sent: 11-22-2019 02:43 AM
From: Liaquat Ali
Subject: ALERT MAP FILE AND second value and MIB table difference
this is not my question this is what you define what is T means and that table reference my question is that
#Switchoverreason
1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.1.14.1.10(19,20)
why there is written 19,20 its not the 19th place on mib table or its not on 19th place in event variables bind i think so... and whats the purpose of 20. i added mib table detail in trail above.
here is the detail in file that you refernce as table.
------------------------------
[Resident Enginner ]
[PTCL]
[ISlamabad]
Original Message:
Sent: 11-21-2019 05:11 AM
From: Catalin Farcasanu
Subject: ALERT MAP FILE AND second value and MIB table difference
In the Event configuration section, T for the 19th variable stands for Table. There should be a file called JuniperRedundancySwitchoverReason_en_US where the correspondance between the received value as varbind and the displayed text in the event presented is realized. Those values are usually populated from information existing in the MIB files.
The same applies for the rest of the mentioned variables (11, 13).
This functionality is described in the documentation (https://techdocs.broadcom.com/content/broadcom/techdocs/us/en/ca-enterprise-software/it-operations-management/spectrum/10-4/managing-network/event-configuration/about-event-table-files.html).
------------------------------
Senior Consultant
SolvIT Networks
Original Message:
Sent: 11-21-2019 02:52 AM
From: Liaquat Ali
Subject: ALERT MAP FILE AND second value and MIB table difference
Hello All,
I am working with events customization about a year but still in some scenarios i am unable to get the main cause of the second value in the alertmap file after an OID. Here is an example of Redundancy switchower alarm from Juniper router.
Please explain it to me the OIDs in MIB table are on different num but as default the numbers are written on alertmap file are different.
------------------------------
[Resident Enginner ]
[PTCL]
[ISlamabad]
------------------------------