Thank you, I have set data_management_active to no, this has stopped the QoS deletion,
I've raised a support case with Arrow, support case 40683.
Original Message:
Sent: Jul 02, 2026 01:08 PM
From: Dhanunjaya Rao Lakhinana
Subject: CU8 QoS Retention Issue
Hi Sam,
Could you please stop data maintenance by setting data_management_active=no in the Data Engine configuration file, and then deactivate and activate the probe. This will disable the data maintenance process. Also, please raise a support case so we can investigate the issue further.
Original Message:
Sent: Jul 01, 2026 04:07 AM
From: Sam Green
Subject: CU8 QoS Retention Issue
Thanks Jason,
When I query the DB directly I can see the oldest entry is 15:10 (yesterday, when I last rescheduled the data_engine).
Here are the results of the query suggested in the KB.
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 30, 2026 12:29 PM
From: Jason Allen
Subject: CU8 QoS Retention Issue
In the past I've seen similar behavior when there was an issue with the partition schema and tables were not propertly partitioned by date range.
The query in this KB should help you determine if this is the case - https://knowledge.broadcom.com/external/article/250815/how-to-determine-if-dataengine-partition.html
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 30, 2026 11:48 AM
From: Sam Green
Subject: CU8 QoS Retention Issue
Thanks Joakim,
I ran some tests by setting data_engine to run during the day so I could watch it. Sure enough, it loses all QoS prior to the schedule I set.
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 29, 2026 04:43 AM
From: Joakim E
Subject: CU8 QoS Retention Issue
We don't see that issue. Just upgraded our test env to CU8 but still got all metrics according to the retention plan.