DX Unified Infrastructure Management

 View Only

  • 1.  CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Posted Jun 26, 2026 06:19 AM

    Hey everyone,

    I upgraded our preprod to CU8 yesterday, after the update I looked at a PRD report.  The QoS only went back to 00:55 that morning (our data_engine retention is 30 days).

    Looking again this morning, our earliest QoS entry is 00:43 this morning.  Checked the DB and it confirms that our QoS data only goes back to 00:43 this morning.

    Has anyone else experienced similar? 



  • 2.  RE: CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Posted Jun 29, 2026 04:26 AM

    Not in my test env.




  • 3.  RE: CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Posted Jun 29, 2026 04:44 AM

    We don't see that issue. Just upgraded our test env to CU8 but still got all metrics according to the retention plan.




  • 4.  RE: CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Posted Jun 30, 2026 11:48 AM

    Thanks Joakim,

    I ran some tests by setting data_engine to run during the day so I could watch it.  Sure enough, it loses all QoS prior to the schedule I set.

    image
    image



  • 5.  RE: CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Jun 30, 2026 12:30 PM

    In the past I've seen similar behavior when there was an issue with the partition schema and tables were not propertly partitioned by date range.

    The query in this KB should help you determine if this is the case - https://knowledge.broadcom.com/external/article/250815/how-to-determine-if-dataengine-partition.html




  • 6.  RE: CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Posted Jul 01, 2026 04:08 AM
    Edited by Sam Green Jul 01, 2026 04:17 AM

    Thanks Jason,

    When I query the DB directly I can see the oldest entry is 15:10 (yesterday, when I last rescheduled the data_engine).

    Here are the results of the query suggested in the KB.

    image




  • 7.  RE: CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Jul 02, 2026 01:08 PM

    Hi Sam,

    Could you please stop data maintenance by setting data_management_active=no in the Data Engine configuration file, and then deactivate and activate the probe.  This will disable the data maintenance process. Also, please raise a support case so we can investigate the issue further.




  • 8.  RE: CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Posted Jul 09, 2026 09:50 AM

    Thank you, I have set data_management_active to no, this has stopped the QoS deletion,

    I've raised a support case with Arrow, support case 40683.




  • 9.  RE: CU8 QoS Retention Issue

    Posted 14 days ago

    Here are the closure notes from the support case:

    After a call with Broadcom SME and we checked your case. The default value for data_management_partition key should be set to no for Oracle DBs, but yes for Microsoft SQL DBs.

    That's why it was set by default at your end to yes without changing it.

    On CU4: If partitioning was set to yes but the database wasn't actually partitioned, older versions of the data_engine often silently failed the partition-drop command and fell back to standard row-by-row deletion. This allowed the system to appear "normal" even with an incorrect configuration.
    On CU8: The maintenance logic is more advanced and strict, the probe specifically looks for partition boundaries to determine what data to keep. If the database is not partitioned, the script may fail to find these boundaries, interpret all existing data as expired, and purge it during the daily maintenance cycle.

    Please keep the data_management_partition set to no on your CU8 environment to stop the 24-hour deletion cycle.

    You may check the database partitioning status with your DBA team and align it with below Broadcom articles.

    https://knowledge.broadcom.com/external/article/250815
    https://knowledge.broadcom.com/external/article/247518/dataengine-best-practices-settings-perf.html