Hi Broadcom support Engineer,
According to my test, the service name rule is valid.
It is correct behavior/design, isn't it?
Best regards,
Marubun,
Original Message:
Sent: May 21, 2024 03:43 AM
From: MARUBUN SUPPORT
Subject: About TCP class for service name and port number
HI PAMSC Support team,
I need your help.
[Environment]
Windows
PAMSC14.1CP05
[Question]
For example:
>er TCP ('microsoft-ds') defacc(n)
>er TCP ('445') defacc(a)
The port number for microsoft-ds is 445.
We can register the rules on selang.
In this case, how should PAMSC work?
PAMSC should give priority to 445 rule.
or
PAMSC should give priority to microsoft-ds rule.
Which is correct?
Best regards,
Marubun