CA IDMS IUA EIUA

Expand all | Collapse all

my first caveat for IDMS release 17

  • 1.  my first caveat for IDMS release 17

    Posted 12-04-2008 06:35 AM
    perhaps we are the only shop in the world still doing this, but we still
    have a COBOL II runtime environment coded in our CV steplib. Yesterday
    CA confirmed that this is not permitted - IDMS will require LE runtime
    environment for internal processing, and it can not be concatenated
    behind the COBOL II runtime environment. Once again, this may affect no
    one other than us, but I thought I would mention this

    PS - for us, we were in the process of changing over, but out prod is
    still COBOL II while our test is LE - so it should not be a biggie!















    Chris Hoelscher
    Senior IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator Humana Inc
    502-476-2538
    choelscher@humana.com




    The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
    which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
    receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender
    and delete or destroy the material/information.
    "
    IDMS 3rd-party providers forum
    IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    Re: my first caveat for IDMS release 17
    "Chris,

    We have had the LE load library for years and we run VSE COBOL, COBOL II
    and LE COBOL in our CV's, Test, QA, and Prod.
    No problems.

    Steve Harmeson


  • 2.  Re:my first caveat for IDMS release 17

    Posted 12-04-2008 06:35 AM
    perhaps we are the only shop in the world still doing this, but we still
    have a COBOL II runtime environment coded in our CV steplib. Yesterday
    CA confirmed that this is not permitted - IDMS will require LE runtime
    environment for internal processing, and it can not be concatenated
    behind the COBOL II runtime environment. Once again, this may affect no
    one other than us, but I thought I would mention this

    PS - for us, we were in the process of changing over, but out prod is
    still COBOL II while our test is LE - so it should not be a biggie!















    Chris Hoelscher
    Senior IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator Humana Inc
    502-476-2538
    choelscher@humana.com




    The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
    which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
    receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender
    and delete or destroy the material/information.
    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    0353 on Calc Record with no index or sets
    "I'm running R16 SP4. I'm getting an err=

    Illustrious Listers:=0D=0A=20=0D=0AI'm running R16 SP4. I'm getting an err=
    or 0353 most likely caused by a record length mis-match with the subschema =
    since there are no indexes or other sets involved. The record is a CALC re=
    cord. There are several good records in the area; but at least one bad one=
    =2E My question: how do I find the bad one(s) and get rid of it/them=3F I=
    ran a DB-AUDIT and it showed no errors; but DMLO , OLQ, and CULPRIT all th=
    row the error; so I know it's real. I'm afraid my IDMS skills are getting =
    pretty rusty since most of my time these days is spent working on another D=
    BMS. Any help would be most appreciated.=0D=0A=20=0D=0AThanks,=0D=0A=20=0D=
    =0A=20=0D=0ARoger C. Lawrence=0D=0ADatabase Administrator=0D=0ASeminole Ele=
    ctric Cooperative, Inc.=0D=0ATampa, Fl.=0D=0A813.739.1518=0D=0A=5F =5F =5F =
    =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F=
    =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F=
    =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F=0D=0A=0D=0A** NOTICE **=0D=0AThis e-mail message, =
    including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended=20=0D=0Areci=
    pient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged informati=
    on.=20=0D=0AAny un-authorized review, copying, use, disclosure, or distribu=
    tion is prohibited.=20=0D=0AIf you are not the intended recipient, please c=
    ontact the sender by reply e-mail and=20=0D=0Adestroy all copies of the ori=
    ginal message.=0D=0A=5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F=
    =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F=
    =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F =5F=0D=0A
    "
    IDMS 3rd-party providers forum
    IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    0353 on Calc Record with no index or sets
    "I'm running R16 SP4. I'm getting an err
    Illustrious Listers:

    I'm running R16 SP4. I'm getting an error 0353 most likely caused by a record length mis-match with the subschema since there are no indexes or other sets involved. The record is a CALC record. There are several good records in the area; but at least one bad one. My question: how do I find the bad one(s) and get rid of it/them? I ran a DB-AUDIT and it showed no errors; but DMLO , OLQ, and CULPRIT all throw the error; so I know it's real. I'm afraid my IDMS skills are getting pretty rusty since most of my time these days is spent working on another DBMS. Any help would be most appreciated.

    Thanks,


    Roger C. Lawrence
    Database Administrator
    Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Tampa, Fl.
    813.739.1518
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    ** NOTICE **
    This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended
    recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information.
    Any un-authorized review, copying, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.
    If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
    destroy all copies of the original message.
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    Re: 0353 on Calc Record with no index or sets
    "Sounds like a subschema issue (out-of-date)
    Might not be new-copied
    Might not have gotten recompiled
    Might be a multi-dictionary environment bugaboo . .