CA IDMS IUA EIUA

Re:Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] Numbers from QO64151 (16.0) and QO64153

  • 1.  Re:Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] Numbers from QO64151 (16.0) and QO64153

    Posted 03-17-2005 05:58 AM
    (15.0)

    Just an FYI - the autotasks would use the ID of the userid that started
    the CA-IDMS CV.
    If you had 3 tasks running and ran ucfjob at same time..even if they had
    the same userid, it counts as a user signed on and you would have 4
    users signed on.
    Basically, if you sign on to a CV and use the same userid, you would
    have 2 people signed on.
    Did your line in DCMT D STAT SYS say:
    USERS: 4 SIGNED ON 4 HWM
    If it did, you could put another command in the UCFBATCH job that says:
    DCUF SHO USERS ALL -- it will list all the users and the LTEs they are
    signed on to.
    Some LTE names may be dynamic ltes for the autotasks. ie, (LD000nnn)
    Here is a display on my system.
    DCUF SHO USERS ALL
    USER ID            PRI  LTERMID
    EFM 000 VL500002
    EFM 000 VL500001
    V500 ENTER NEXT TASK CODE:
    Despite same userid (EFM), this would show as 2 users signed on in the
    DCMT D STA SYS output.
    USERS: 2 SIGNED ON 2 HWM
    Hope this helps.. Ed McKinney - CA

    This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it
    is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged
    information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
    recipients of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take
    action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent
    reply, should be deleted or destroyed.
    This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipients of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.

    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] Numbers from QO64151 (16.0) and QO64153 ( 15.0)
    "I think you would get the multiple concurrent signons under the same
    userid (for autotasks) even if Multiple signons are NOT allowed.

    Chris Hoelscher
    IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator
    Humana Inc
    502-580-2538
    choelscher@humana.com





    The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    New User information in DCMT D STAT SyS
    "Just in case anyone was wondering why these new fields have been created. They are a requirement for sites that are going to compete in the"" Winter Corp Top Ten contest"". We also felt it would be an interesting and useful statistic to include in ""DCMT D STAT SYS"" output. The contest is a survey of the world's largest and most heavily used databases

    Details for the contest can be found at:
    http://www.wintercorp.com/VLDB/2005_TopTen_Survey/TopTenProgram.html

    Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or think you might like to enter the contest.
    Thanks


    John A Siraco
    Computer Associates
    Manager, Level 2 Support
    tel: +1 508 628-8247
    fax: +1 508 820-2934
    john.siraco@ca.com

    "
    IDMS Public Discussion Forum
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
    SMTP








    Normal

    Normal
    Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] Numbers from QO64151 (16.0) and QO64153 ( 15.0)
    "A quick test, after removing 2 of the 3 autotasks gave me a HWM of 2. As
    Chris mention's it does not need mutliple signon to be on for this to
    happen.

    The new figures will give a good understanding of how many users are
    signed on for a session.

    Chris