VDB question

[ca.portal.admin]

As part of upgrading IDMS to R16, we will have to upgrade ASG's VDB
(Virtual DataBase) from 5.0.5 to 5.1.2. Does anyone know if we can use
our existing global definition file (VSAM), or if we have to create a
new one?

Kay Rozeboom
State of Iowa
Information Technology Enterprise
Department of Administrative Services
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
[e-mail]
SMTP
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
SMTP








Normal

Normal
VDB question
"As part of upgrading IDMS to R16, we will have to upgrade ASG's VDB
(Virtual DataBase) from 5.0.5 to 5.1.2. Does anyone know if we can use
our existing global definition file (VSAM), or if we have to create a
new one?

Kay Rozeboom
State of Iowa
Information Technology Enterprise
Department of Administrative Services
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
[e-mail]
SMTP
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Print space oddities
"Joe,

Interesting idea, but if that were the case, the job would abend in the
same place every time, right?

Thanks all for your various thoughts and suggestions. I'll take several
of them, tweak the jobstream and see how things go over the next few weeks.

Buz

>>

Subject:
Re: IDMS-L Digest - 13 Feb 2005 to 14 Feb 2005 (#2005-34)
From:
""Lupico, Joe"" <[e-mail]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:31:45 -0500


Buz,
Let me see if I get this straight. The weekly job has some DD statements
in it (for the database areas) and it bombs. Your job has no DD statements
and runs clean.
So, it's obvious the DMCL has the files coded for dynamic allocation and
those are the files you are using. Since a DD statement will take presedent
over the DMCL, is it possible the weekly job is using the wrong DD
statements? Maybe the correct files, just coded on the wrong DD
statement(s)?

Joe Lupico
IDMS System Support
""Our World is a Happy World""

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
[e-mail]
SMTP
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: IDMS-L Digest - 13 Feb 2005 to 14 Feb 2005 (#2005-34)
"Buz,
Let me see if I get this straight. The weekly job has some DD statements
in it (for the database areas) and it bombs. Your job has no DD statements
and runs clean.
So, it's obvious the DMCL has the files coded for dynamic allocation and
those are the files you are using. Since a DD statement will take presedent
over the DMCL, is it possible the weekly job is using the wrong DD
statements? Maybe the correct files, just coded on the wrong DD
statement(s)?

Joe Lupico
IDMS System Support
""Our World is a Happy World""