Currently, my customer is having a problem with their services MS Dynamic AX 2012 and MS Dynamic GP 2012. The problem that they are facing is a slow response. They are now looking a solution to find out what is the root cause of the problems from those 2 services.
Customer already gave me the information of the services topology (server, network, database, application). The MS Dynamic AX 2012 is written in X++ and the MS Dynamic GP is written with Dexterity running on top IIS 8.
I'm going to propose CA UIM and CA APM.
Especially for CA APM, I already had experience with CA APM to monitor Dynamic AX. Now how about MS Dynamic GP. I don't have any knowledge with MS Dynamix GP.
Is anybody here had experience with CA APM to monitor Dynamic GP? What does CA APM obtain in monitoring MS Dynamic GP? Is there any limitation from CA APM to monitor Dynamic GP?
Page 25 is a good place to start:
Page 27 is where the specific details are to what and how to monitor performance using PerfMon.
Thanks for the information. This information is very helpful.